94 min. / 2010

“We have to decide for ourselves what we want. We are the ones who know about our needs and what is happening in our community”, Omayra Peréz explains confidently. She wants to convince her community, located on the hillside of the poor districts of Caracas, to found a Consejo Comunal (community council). In more than 30.000 Consejos Comunales the Venezuelan inhabitants decide on their concerns collectively via assemblies. Omayra is supported by the activists of the nearby shantytown “Emiliano Hernández”, which has had a Consejo Comunal for three years already. The inhabitants there managed to get a doctor from the governmental program “Barrio Adentro”, who treats everyone free of charge. They also got money to renovate their houses and replaced over a dozen of sheet iron huts by new houses. All of these activities and a lot more have been organized via the Consejo Comunal. By local self-organization from below several working groups have been established on self-decided topics and decisions are made in assemblies.

Several Consejos Comunales can form a Comuna and finally a communal town. The film “Comuna Under Construction” follows these developments throughout the hillside of the shantytowns of Caracas and the vast and wet plains of Barinas in the countryside. The councils are built from below and alongside the existing institutions and are supposed to overcome the existing state through self-government. In an assembly for the construction of the communal town “Antonio José de Sucre” Ramon Virigay from the independent peasant’s organization Frente Nacional Campesino Ezequiel Zamora (FNCEZ) reminds the delegates of the participating Consejos Comunales: “Even if we definitely need the government agencies at the moment, we have to be independent tomorrow due to our development. We cannot depend solely on the state forever.” For this reason the councils are to establish own structures of production and distribution in order to achieve autonomy.

The assemblies are a central element of the film “Comuna Under Construction”. The film starts off in the well organized Consejo Comunal Emiliano Hernández located in one of the shantytowns of Caracas. It then shows the intentions of forming Comunas and a communal town in rural Barinas and ends in Petare, a gigantic shantytown of the agglomeration of Caracas where there are 29 Consejos Comunales intending to build the Comuna of Maca.

Is it even possible to bring together state and autonomy? Every one of the Consejos Comunales spokes-persons has positive as well as negative experiences with the institutions in store to talk about. In an assembly in Petare the grass-roots activist Yusmeli Patiño blames a high government representative: “We are losing our credibility because of the incompetence of the state institutions”. But there are also members of the institutions who make a big effort to accompany the basis in making its own decisions. The relation between the basis and the institutions is marked by cooperation as well as conflict. But the Consejos Comunales also have internal difficulties; participation has to be learned.

Progresses as well as setbacks mark the difficult process of people actually taking the power of deciding on their own lives and environment by themselves.

Original Spanish version with German and English subtitles available.

ROMA (21 febbraio) – Una task force di mezzo migliaio di agenti tra vigili urbani, poliziotti in assetto antisommossa e carabinieri. Accordi già presi con sei residence. E le ruspe pronte a motori accesi. Inizierà da martedì mattina l’operazione di sgombero e di bonifica dell’Idroscalo di Ostia.

L’intervento, originariamente previsto per il mese di novembre scorso, è stato pianificato dall’amministrazione comunale insieme con la Questura di Roma e la Prefettura. Mercoledì scorso sarebbe stata firmata la relativa ordinanza: il condizionale è d’obbligo perché il sindaco Gianni Alemanno smentisce. «E’ una decisione assunta a Roma riferisce invece il presidente del XIII Municipio, Giacomo Vizzani Sarebbe dovuta restare un’operazione coperta dal massimo riserbo: la fuga di notizie non fa bene alla buona soluzione della vicenda.

Leggi l’articolo: Fiumicino Idroscalo

ROMA – Un silenzio irreale. Rotto soltanto dal rumore delle ruspe che entrano in azione per abbattere le ultime baracche. Al di là del cancello del «Casilino 900», il campo nomadi abusivo più grande d’Europa, lunedì mattina c’era il deserto. Non si sentivano più le voci dei bambini, delle donne intente a chiacchierare, dei ragazzi che parlavano tra loro. Gianni Alemanno è arrivato intorno alle 12.30, ha indossato un giubbetto catarifrangente come quello degli operai addetti allo sgombero, poi ha presenziato alla chiusura definitiva dei cancelli.

Poco prima, la ruspa che buttava giù la «case» – per 40 anni, fino al 14 febbraio, il campo ha ospitato rom bosniaci, montenegrini e kosovari, aveva abbattuto simbolicamente l’ultima baracca, davanti al sindaco.

Leggi l’articolo: Redazione online 15 febbraio 2010
Corriwere della Sera (ultima modifica: 17 febbraio 2010)

Neda è una signora romana di 50 anni. Una “romana de Roma”. Nel senso che è cresciuta negli anni ‘60 nel cuore della capitale, a due passi dal Colosseo. Oggi però Neda non vive più nel suo rione. Sta a Ponte di Nona. Nel cuore delle “nuove centralità” alla periferia di Roma. 6 Km oltre il Grande Raccordo Anulare, lungo la Prenestina, oltre 20 km dal Colosseo.
Sara, 18 anni, a Ponte di Nona invece ci è cresciuta. Figlia di una pugliese e di un egiziano, è una delle pochissime ragazze di Ponte di Nona che ha avuto la possibilità di studiare al liceo.
More: http://magarilecosecambiano.blogspot.com/

Antiziganism and Class Racism in Europe by Vladan Jeremic and Rena Rädle, April 2009 The Roma have a long history of migrations that repeatedly brought repression to their people over the centuries. European countries began introducing laws against migrating peoples (i.e. nomads, travelers) in the mid-Fifteenth century (1). Migrants were perceived as an unsettling factor, even as a threatening and invading group, one that jeopardized the safety of the majority population. Without a registered identity, many Roma remain completely isolated as citizens in the societies on whose territories they live. Being constantly relocated and repopulated, many have been migrants over the centuries; even within the boundaries of the countries whose citizenship they hold. Apart from accusations, disappointments and misunderstandings in their relations with the majority population, we are still facing deep discrimination of Roma, which doesn’t have its roots only in ethnic and cultural racism or anti-Roma sentiment. Poverty and nomadism are threatening factors for all of those who live in social systems based on the system of ownership, accumulation of goods and territorialism. Western policies have tried for centuries to include the poor in the system of social protection, or to get rid of them: to banish or eliminate them. Roma are, for the most part, an ethnic class characterized by extreme poverty that can present an obstacle to national or European integrations. It appears that the relation between Roma and non-Roma is, first and foremost, defined by the borderline between wealth and extreme poverty. The situation of Roma in EU member countries is precarious and in countries populated to a greater extent by Roma, such as Romania, Hungary, Bulgaria and in the former Yugoslav republics (especially in Macedonia and Serbia) – the situation is alarming. The situation in which most European Roma find themselves is similar to that of a holocaust. One of the basic problems facing a Roma man or a woman is the issue of belonging to a marginalized social class that is exposed to drastic pauperization, in addition to the problem of the national identity itself – the fact of being Roma.

Various forms of ethnic and class racism against Roma are appearing throughout Europe. In May 2008 in Naples, Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi’s Government implemented a state of emergency regarding nomad settlements and communities on the territory of several regions in order to legitimize fingerprinting of the Roma population.
This law is very reminiscent of anti-Roma laws dating from the Middle Ages, and of the darkest periods of European history in the 20th century. The general situation of migrants in Italy is difficult and the violent activities undertaken by the fascist right targeting Roma have reached a peak in the burning of entire settlements, the destruction of property, and the forceful evictions of Roma communities to locations outside certain metropolitan areas in Italy. The most drastic examples of this kind happened in Livorno, Roma, Napoli and Milano between 2006 and today (2). Similarly in Finland, a settlement built by Roma emigrating from Romania to Helsinki in search of a better future was also destroyed. During our visit to Helsinki in March 2009, we took part in conversations (3) that were part of the exhibition about the history and culture of Roma: Watch out Gypsies: The History of a Misunderstanding (4), in the Helsinki City Museum. This visit further convinced us that impoverished Roma are being actively prevented in their attempts to migrate. Strict EU laws prevent Roma from living or working in alternative ways and thus are not seen as ‘fitting in’ with the EU reality. The most harrowing images, however, come from Hungary, where an actual hunt on Roma communities has been on-going since the end of 2008. The killing of Roma families by neo-Nazi groups is an example of the worst racist hunt on people in the middle of Europe (5). Whether living in EU or non-EU countries, a deep and an unexamined hatred for Roma peoples is widespread across Europe. It is symptomatic that direct violence against Roma is most intense in places where a great gap exists between those profiting from neoliberal reforms and local population on the verge of poverty. Under the Bridge Belgrade While traveling through Belgrade, driving along the E–75 international highway and crossing the Gazela bridge that connects central Belgrade with New Belgrade, we came across the poverty-stricken Roma settlement in the area of Staro Sajmište. The first time we met people living under the bridge Gazela was during a gathering of artists and activists working on the project Under the Bridge Belgrade, which was organized in cooperation with our colleague Alexander Nikolić in December 2004. Under the Bridge Belgrade is a complex research project about the municipal area of Belgrade, and one of the actions organized as a result was the aforementioned gathering under the Gazela bridge. This gathering turned into a great happening that lasted eight hours, during which the settlement’s residents, both Roma and other refugees, invited all those present to ignite a fire and stay with them at the settlement. One of the project’s participants, David Rych, wrote a piece about our gathering under the Gazela bridge and stated that: ‘The ‘artist like Mother Teresa’ can only be a misconception, unless the quest for relevant support will necessarily lead to approved models of inclusive community work, something that would require time and commitment with regard to every single case. There are a number of issues that have been clearly addressed by representatives of the Roma community mentioned above. An additional objective of entering unfamiliar hardship for the sake of cultural work could be to translate these transitions into a more comprehensible image of the ‘real.’ Clearly, we’ll have to acknowledge the incompatibility of reality lived by individuals and groups on opposite synapses of our societies, nations or other categories of distinction and dissolve the reality of ‘the Other’ as one more component of a mutually shared entity and investigate and visualize the mechanisms of exclusion the dominate system applies with regard to marginalized positions only. Some of the visitors might have been introduced to a local situation in order to initiate contributions to that very common reality. A few others might continue similar work in different locations. And, of course, some might never come back. Not there, not elsewhere where the most ’subaltern’ live. Sometimes the frontier is your doorstep…’ (6). During the following few years, several artists continued their activism with the community under the Gazela bridge, in the form of either reports or artistic interventions (7). Vienna artists are currently publishing a tourist guide for the Gazela settlement. (8). Belgrade authorities have been trying to evict the inhabitants of Gazela and several other Roma settlements for a while now. Deportation/relocation is not triggered by the community’s miserable living conditions or the settlements’ poor condition, but by planned infrastructure works and the current reconstruction of the Gazela Bridge. In 2005, Belgrade City Hall proposed an idea to relocate Roma living in the Gazela settlements and move them to the ‘Dr. Ivan Ribar’ neighborhood in New Belgrade, which triggered protests by the locals. Although their protest represents open hostility toward Roma, New Belgrade residents claimed that the issue was not racism, but fear of filth and decrease of real estate prices: ‘We have nothing against Roma, but we fear that their customs and culture will not fit in the city environment – said one of the residents – There will be problems with hygiene. How will anyone of us sell their apartment if there is such a settlement right next to us?’ (9). A similar protest happened in September 2008, when the residents of the Belgrade suburban neighborhood of Ovca tried to block initial work on a new Roma settlement there. ‘We have nothing against Roma, we would react the same way if some other ethnic minority were to inhabit Ovca. The problem is the fact that the relocation of 130 Roma families would significantly alter the national structure of this population. This will have a catastrophic effect on our tradition and way of life’ explained one of the Organization Committee members who a member of the Romanian ethnic minority (10). New Belgrade’s Belville Belville is the name of a new residential complex in New Belgrade, built by Blok 67 Associates Ltd. This company was founded by Delta Real Estate (part of the Delta Holding Company owned by Miroslav Miskovic, Serbia’s richest tycoon) and Hypo-Alpe Adria Bank (11). Their aim is to build business offices and apartments for athletes taking part in the Summer Universiade in June 2009 in Belgrade. After the Universiade, the apartments will be handed to new and predefined owners. On April 3, 2009, in a sudden action with mechanical-diggers, forty houses were demolished in a Roma settlement that had begun taking shape during the last five years in a location near Belville. The decision to demolish the Roma houses was made by Belgrade’s Secretariat for Inspections. City Mayor, Dragan Djilas, said on this issue that: ‘Whoever is illegally occupying a part of city land in places planned for infrastructure facilities cannot stay there. It has nothing to do with the fact that the people in question are Roma or some other ethnicity. A few hundred people cannot stop the development of Belgrade, and two million people living in Belgrade certainly won’t be hostages to anyone. This practice shall continue to be implemented by the City Authority in the future. Simply – there are no other solutions’ (12). The police assisted in the demolition of the settlement by securing the diggers, without giving residents the time to rescue their belongings. Several inhabitants had to be practically drawn out of the ruins at the very moment when one digger was clearing the area. As we were close by, we joined our neighbors from the very beginning of this action in Block 67. As an act of protest to the home demolitions, Jurija Gagarina Street was blocked around noon that day. The settlement’s inhabitants then organized another protest in front of Belgrade City Hall. No one addressed the displaced Roma residents from Block 67 who gathered in front of the Belgrade City Hall that evening. The protest continued the following day. Following protests by the public, several NGOs also started to raise their voices. Pushed by UNHCR, the WHO and the Ministry of Human and Minority Rights, the Belgrade city authorities tried to settle down the issue. The ’solution’ was to set up residential containers in the suburban neighborhood Boljevci that very night. The bureaucratic apparatus that was set in motion to ’solve’ this issue in the field soon proved to be non-functional. We learned that a Roma teenage boy had been killed several years ago in Boljevci. So there is a logical question: why was it decided that the containers should be placed in this very village? Boljevci residents blocked roads demanding that residential containers for Roma be removed: ‘If you don’t remove them, we will burn down both the containers and those trying to move in them’, one person from Boljevci said. The protests by Boljevci residents had violent moments: attempts were made to burn down residential containers and thus prevent Roma from moving into these temporary facilities. The incident resembled an open racist revolt. Mayor Djilas said: ‘I can understand the fear of people from Boljevci, because they were to have as neighbors people who, in part, do not even have personal ID cards. It is not known who they are’, adding that ‘all those who do not have a residence in Belgrade must go back to the places they came from. It is legally right, it is the basis for everything, and there will be no negotiations with the OEBS, UNHCR, or NGOs on this issue.’ (13). So, as far as Djilas was concerned, the Roma issue was ’solved’ by placing a three Roma mothers with children into containers in Mirijevo, near the old Roma settlement. The majority of the people still have no alternative solution. Although Serbia is currently presiding over the ‘Roma Decade’ in 2009, city authorities didn’t have a plan for alternative housing at the moment the houses were demolished. It took three protests and pressure from international organizations to stop the media lynch against Roma and to try to find a solution for alternative housing. Our documentary ‘Belleville’ was filmed during the ten days when these events happened in which we took part directly as active participants fighting for the rights of our neighbors. This documentary premiered in the Cultural Centre of Serbia in Paris where it was included at the last moment in our exhibition previously called ‘Psychogeographic Research’. On 27th of May 2009, the film was shown at the settlement in Blok 67. European Slums UN-Habitat’s Global Report (14) distinguishes six different ‘cities’ with specified class actors and economic functions: there is the luxury city, the gentrified city with advanced services, the suburban city of direct production, the city of unskilled workers, and finally the city of permanently unemployed ‘underclass’ or ‘ghetto poor’ with income based on marginal or illegal activity and direct street-level exploitation. This last city is the informal city or city of illegality, which comprises the slums of large megacities such as Lagos in Nigeria or Sao Paolo in Brazil. The informal sector has its base there; services are reduced and unstable, and residents do not have a legal status and are not part of the legal system. Harassment by authorities is commonplace. The poorest Roma settlements in Serbia and throughout Europe can be qualified as slum cities typically associated with the global South. The UN-Habitat’s Global Report on human settlements from 2003 defines slums as settlements with poor access to drinking water, sanitation and other infrastructure; with poor housing quality, overcrowdedness and by the uncertain residential status of its inhabitants. These characteristics provided by UN-Habitat can be applied to more than a hundred Roma settlements in Belgrade. The composition of the population and its status in Belgrade’s slums is divergent. There are cases of Roma who have managed to secure registered residences in Belgrade or who are indigenous. There are also the Roma refugees from Kosovo who may represent between 20- 40% of the population in a given settlement in Belgrade. A number of inhabitants are economic migrants from southern Serbia, from places where no economic existence is possible. A large number of inhabitants are Roma asylum seekers from Western European countries and the EU, who were deported back into Serbia by the Readmission Agreement. A number of inhabitants in these settlements are not of Roma descent, just the poorest of the poor, refugees or the socially excluded. A great number of those living in these settlements are children and youth. Some estimates put the number of Roma in Serbia at 600,000, although the 2002 census only registered 102,193 people as Roma. The number and condition of Roma children and youth can be best understood from the following data: ‘According to the UNICEF report on the condition of Roma children in the Republic of Serbia (2006), almost 70% of Roma children are poor and over 60% of Roma households with children live below poverty line. Children are the most imperiled, living outside of cities in households with several children. Over 4/5 of indigent Roma children live in families in which adult members do not have basic education.’ (15). If we consider the existing data on urban poverty and the dynamics of ’slumization’, we can better analyze the demolitions that occurred in the Belgrade neighborhood of Blok 67. Complex relations between local authorities and local residents become even more complex in the proximity of the Flea Market. The market is a source of income and survival for people who gather and resell recycled goods. Local and flea market authorities have developed a string of rules, networks and complex arrangements with the locals / users of the market from whom they generate a certain amount of profit. In his publication ‘Planet of Slums’ (16), Mike Davis says that national and local political machines acquiesce in informal settlement as long as they can control the political complexion of the slums and extract direct financial benefit from them. These almost feudal relations of dependence on local police or important players in certain political parties and non-governmental organizations are deeply rooted and disloyalty may cause the destruction of the slum itself. The current stratification of European societies which is particularly evident in the countries of the former Soviet Union and the former Yugoslavia may cause social unrest in which Roma might play an important role as a trans-national ethnic group. Non-controlled Roma migration to countries of Western Europe is not desirable, even though the borders are open. It is not surprising that there is a strategy to ’solve the Roma issue’ in these countries. The ‘Decade of Roma Inclusion 2005-2015′ gathers together the countries of Central and South Eastern Europe, international and non-governmental organizations (like the World Bank, the Open Society Institute, United Nations Development Program, the Council of Europe, Council of Europe Development Bank (17)) and Roma civic associations. The objective is to improve the status of Roma and ‘close unacceptable gaps between Roma and the rest of society.’ In addition to areas of major concern (housing, education, employment, and health), special attention is given to the elimination of discrimination, the reduction of poverty and the improvement of the position of Roma women. Including representatives of Roma communities in all processes is the basic principle. The policy of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to lend money to countries which meet the requirement to privatize territory, real estate and resources, as a result brought devastation to local economies in Asia, Africa and Latin America in the 80’s, as well as elimination of the middle class and ’slumization’ of entire regions. The ‘Decade of Roma Inclusion’ is intended to lead to the nominal equality of Roma communities in the countries participating in the Decade, in order to legitimize their deportation from EU countries back into to their ‘native countries’. At the same time, the elite that carried out the inclusion by controlling financial and other aid is being supported. This is counterproductive to the development of Roma communities as self-organized political subjects.

(1) Robert Jütte, Poverty and Deviance in Early Modern Europe, Cambridge, 1994
(2) Security a la Italiana: Fingerprinting, Extreme Violence and Harassment of Roma in Italy, 2008, Report, European Roma Rights Centre and others; Source: www.soros.org/initiatives/roma/articles_publications/publications/fingerprinting_20080715/fingerprinting_20080715.pdf (Link: http://mailer.e-artnow.org/?RDCT=930f814bd2539605ce21 )
(3) Source: www.hiap.fi/index.php?page=304&abr=0&event=137 (Link: http://mailer.e-artnow.org/?RDCT=6fdea79922f0b4929782 )
(4) Source: www.hel.fi/wps/portal/Kaupunginmuseo_en/Artikkeli_en?WCM_GLOBAL_CONTEXT=/Museo/en/museum+news/news+and+events/leave+your+roma+prejudices+behind (Link: http://mailer.e-artnow.org/?RDCT=ceb7c94991a7e4bdb8fc ) (5) Source: www.dur.org.rs/cms/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=83:u-maarskoj-rome-ubijaju-po-metodologiji-slinoj-taktici-amerikog-kju-kluks-klana&catid=34:vesti&Itemid=56 (Link: http://mailer.e-artnow.org/?RDCT=dcaf0ef3a9726c1c04da )
(6). David Rych, „Under the Bridge – A derivé to a topos of social relevance or… ‘a visit to the zoo’?’ pages 34-37, Under the Bridge Beograd, Bureau for Culture and Communication, Novi Sad, 2005
(7) Tanja Ostojic, Open Studio of New Belgrade Chronicle, 2007; Source: tanjaostojic.blogspot.com/ (Link: http://mailer.e-artnow.org/?RDCT=3f6e64b5b1249a456985 )
(8) Lorenz Aggermann, Eduard Freudmann, Can Gülcü, Beograd Gazela-Reiseführer in eine Elendssiedlung., Drava Verlag, Klagenfurt, 2008
(9) Vecernje novosti, July 11, 2005, Source: www.novosti.rs/code/navigate.php?Id=14&status=jedna&vest=77610&datum= (Link: http://mailer.e-artnow.org/?RDCT=56b903226f3e4d7a3e3f )
(10) Source: www.b92.net/info/vesti/index.php?yyyy=2008&mm=09&dd=24&nav_id=320375&nav_category=12 (Link: http://mailer.e-artnow.org/?RDCT=87984375c10dddad8543 )
(11) Source: www.belville.rs/kosmomi.jsp (Link: http://mailer.e-artnow.org/?RDCT=2f5d2a31d38645871988 )
(12) Borba, April3, 2009; Source: www.borba.rs/content/view/4472/123/ (Link: http://mailer.e-artnow.org/?RDCT=55ea606391a7d25a3e8a )
(13) YUCOM, Regards from Saban Bajramovic, Pescanik; Source: www.pescanik.net/content/view/2970/61/ (Link: http://mailer.e-artnow.org/?RDCT=dbf95a71261d5fc71ae7 )
(14) The challenge of slums- Global report on human settlements 2003, UN Habitat; Source: www.unhabitat.org/downloads/docs/GRHS.2003.3.pdf (Link: http://mailer.e-artnow.org/?RDCT=793bf4f4141d0d251263 )
(15) Government of Serbia, Strategy for the Improvement of Roma Status in the Republic of Serbia’, „Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia’, No. 55/05, 71/05- Correction, 101/07 and 65/08), Belgrade, April 9, 2009; Source: www.humanrights.gov.yu/dokumenti/roma/strategija_april_09.pdf (Link: http://mailer.e-artnow.org/?RDCT=521eeeb851425cf38808 )
(16) Mike Davis, Planet of Slums, Verso, London 2007; Shorter version of the essay at: abahlali.org/files/NLR26001.pdf (Link: http://mailer.e-artnow.org/?RDCT=58875d83ed4661ddc184 )
(17) Source: www.romadecade.org/index.php?content=1 (Link: http://mailer.e-artnow.org/?RDCT=c68d99ce6607afb2601d )

Through his interest in autoconstrucción (”self-construction”), Abraham Cruzvillegas explores economies of the makeshift, the handmade and the recycled. His recent work gravitates toward an examination of his childhood home and the neighborhood of Ajusco, a district in the south of Mexico City founded by migrants who, like his parents, squatted and settled in what was deemed uninhabitable land in the 1960s. To this day, Ajusco’s landscape of volcanic rock remains a work in process. Structures are in a constant state of transformation, as additions are made when materials become available and necessity dictates.

In contrast to cities developed with central planning or strict building codes, the architecture of each building in Ajusco is heterogeneous and manifests the particular vision of those who built it, often referencing a hybrid of styles and sensibilities indicative of an individuals’ ideals and often informed by other people, places and times. The sense of ingenuity and improvisation that characterizes the landscape here reflects the vibrant, self-reliant and politically active community (who fought for the rights to property ownership) and becomes the impetus for the artist’s own exploration of the roots of his practice.

In a text accompanying his recent exhibition at The Centre for Contemporary Arts in Glasgow, Cruzvillegas explains:

Many of my works are evidence of my will to confront at once two or more radically different economic systems through bricollage [sic] or assemblage, making hybrid marriages and bizarre mixtures of materials and techniques &.a reproduction of the diverse dynamics involved, regarding the economic and social environment as a sort of scaffolding through/on which I do my moves.
At REDCAT, Abraham Cruzvillegas continues to expand upon his interest in social organization, collaboration and exchange. For this solo exhibition, the artist presents a newly commissioned film that offers a rich portrait of Ajusco. Shot on location with non-professional actors and developed by a self-organized, guerilla-style film cooperative, the film employs an unconventional narrative without dialogue, intertwining footage of the landscape with unscripted moments of intimacy and encounter. Cruzvillegas’ film uses the predictable, mechanistic structure of early pornographic films to build a non-linear story made up of fragments that collapses the past and present–the neighborhood’s history and present, landscape and everyday life–as an abstract portrait. The film, the artist’s first, will be installed along side other related work including storyboards made by other artists.

Over the past ten years, Abraham Cruzvillegas has developed a language of improvisation and assemblage that brings together materials into attentive, though unexpected, states of energy and equilibrium. In earlier works, the artist dynamically integrates natural objects such as candles handmade from animal fat, bird feathers, maguey leaves, wool and beads with more “_modern” or manufactured materials such as milled lumber, metal, tools and consumer packaging–contemplating notions of craft, authorship and hybrid forms.

This exhibition is accompanied by a major bilingual (English and Spanish), four-color monograph about the artist’s ongoing interest in autoconstrucción as methodology and form. The publication includes an exquisite corpse like exchange between the legendary artist, writer and activist Jimmie Durham and Cruzvillegas as well as contributions by Mark Godfrey, Clara Kim and Ryan Inouye. The publication will be available in late October/early November.

Born in 1968 in México City, Abraham Cruzvillegas has presented solo exhibitions at California College of the Arts, Wattis Institute for Contemporary Arts, San Francisco; The Centre for Contemporary Arts, Glasgow; Museo de Arte Contemporáneo de Oaxaca (MACO), Oaxaca; Contemporary Arts Museum, Houston; Museo Universitario de Ciencias y Arte (MUCA), México City, among others. He has participated in the 10th Havana Biennial in 2009, 50th Venice Biennale in 2003 and the 25th São Paulo Biennial in 2002 as well as group exhibitions at Fundación/Colección Jumex, Ecatepec, México; New Museum, New York; Museum of Contemporary Art, Chicago and Walker Art Center, Minneapolis.
More informations: http://www.redcat.org

International conference under the title “Post-capitalist City” was held from 14. to 16. August in Pula. Fourteen European groups presented their work in the context of political reading of the city and new forms of production emerging in different spaces.

More: http://postcapitalistcity.blog.hr/
Fotostreaming of Conference: http://www.flickr.com/photos/pulskagrupa/show/

Conference on Post-capitalist City,  Pula – Croatia, 14.-16.8.2009
Before the splitting of the Self Made City working group we were invited as co- founder of the Self Made City project.
This is the reason because at this conference we are still announced as Self Made City.

At the conference we will present as urbanXchange our new and still unnamed project. We will speak about the workshop “Imparare da Borghesiana” which took place in Rome in July 2009.

More informations: http://smu-research.net/projects/imparare-da-borghesiana

About urbanXchange

The city is the space where the reproduction of social, political and economic forms of life takes
place and where these forms of life confront instrumental political power or political diagonal. This
reproduction of forms of life represents the central site of exploitation as well as of resistance.
Resistance is manifested through production of common values and through cooperation. This
complex environment can be the key force behind the making of democracy, justice, common
values and free space. Cities can become places of post-capitalism.
During three days, the Conference on Post-capitalist City will present the common experiences
of European groups involved in mapping, planning and creating situations which escape both the
capitalist logic of production of space and reproduction of life. Some of these groups will present
their work in the form of lectures after which discussions will follow.
- The goal of the Conference is to affirm an international network of individuals and groups
exploring various forms of self-organizing in urban planning. The participants’ experiences, their
current projects and practices, will be collected in a catalogue/brochure which will be used for
further activities. The catalogue is conceived as a theoretical elaboration of practices, sorted by
the criteria of 1) method 2) tools/instruments 3) strategy and tactics.
- Our intention is to share experiences as well as create a Document summarizing our
conclusions into a general thesis to be used in further actions.
The project’s hypothesis: It is necessary to reread the processes of exploitation and resistance in
the city as well as understand the curren relations of political powers in order to create a new
urbanism, independent from the state and other political institutions. In other words, we propose
that the separation of urban planning from the state is finally conceivable. The existing
forms of production and life have already erased the border between the profession and its
beneficiaries, between planners and citizens, architects and activists. To research new aspects
of urban development is to reinvent them. Individual experience has become the key for
describing the new urban dynamics.
The Symposium will take place in Pula, a city on the Croatian coast. This environment should be
inspiring for investigating the separation of planning and state because the state has been
retreating from Pula for the last 20 years. An historical military port, the town was deserted by the
army and now offers vast abandoned areas. Most of these spaces did not integrate into
commodity markets and the accompanying system of political power, but were transformed
instead into a laboratory for new forms of living, an informal economy and autonomous production
of common values. At this moment, the size of the ex-military areas developing independently is
ten times bigger than the ex-military areas officially integrated into the dominant economic
regime.
The process of demilitarization in Pula started as a minor issue, but has subsequently grown into
the central process by which the city is transformed. As in other cities in a similar situation, here
too the same question arises: What knowledge, methods and tools are needed to establish a
new practice of city planning based on new forms of living, and to turn the existing
political diagonal in its own advantage?
The Symposium on Post-Capitalist City is a part of the 11. Multimedia festival Media
Mediterranea.